S2470C Behaviour Change S2470C Graded Assignment The LifeLab @ St Luke is an experiential and interactive learning facility designed to educate on the physical, sensory and psychosocial challenges experienced by seniors.

S2470C Behaviour Change S2470C Graded Assignment The LifeLab @ St Luke is an experiential and interactive learning facility designed to educate on the physical, sensory and psychosocial challenges experienced by seniors. Visitors may experience the use of geriatric simulation suits and attempt activities of daily living to gain insights into seniors’ daily struggles.

Although Life Lab provides an immersive learning environment, caregivers may differ in how effectively they develop and maintain empathy. This assignment requires you to examine the behavioural change principles that influence caregiver empathy and propose behaviour change techniques that may enhance the Life Lab’s educational experience for caregiver training.

Please answer all questions below:

1. Describe and explain FOUR predisposing factors that influence caregivers’ empathy towards ageing seniorsin relation to the LifeLab(12 marks).
2. Discuss and propose how FOUR enabling factors within the LifeLab that could allow caregivers to understand seniors’ experiences and develop empathy (12 marks).
3. Explain FOURreinforcing factors that may help caregivers maintain empathy during the LifeLab experienceand recommend post activities for these factors (8 marks).
4. Apply SIX Behaviour Change Techniques to improve empathy among caregivers and explain how each BCTs can be applied to caregiver training within the LifeLab(18 marks).

(50 marks)

S2470C Assignment Rubric Excellent Good Fair Poor Weak

1. Describe and explain FOUR predisposing factors that influence caregivers’ empathy towards ageing seniors in relation to the LifeLab (12 marks). Presents four highly relevant and well-defined predisposing factors and provides thorough, insightful explanations that clearly show how each factor affects empathy. Demonstrates a strong and explicit connection to Life Lab learning experiences. Identifies four relevant predisposing factors with clear explanations and offers a reasonable link between the factors and Life Lab experiences, though not always deeply developed. Demonstrates sound understanding of empathy development, with minor gaps in detail or clarity. Identifies three to four predisposing factors, though one may be weakly justified or not fully aligned with the Life Lab context and explanations are adequate but somewhat general, lacking deeper insight. Provides limited or surface-level references to the Life Lab. Identifies two or three predisposing factors, with explanations that are unclear, incomplete, or mostly descriptive. Connections to the Life Lab are minimal or absent. Provides one or no valid predisposing factors and explanations are largely incorrect, irrelevant, or missing. No evidence of understanding the Life Lab context or empathy development.
2. Discuss and propose how FOUR enabling factors within Life Lab could allow caregivers to understand seniors’ experiences and develop empathy (12 marks). Presents four highly relevant and well-defined enabling factors and provides thorough, insightful explanations that clearly show how each factor affects empathy. Demonstrates a strong and explicit connection to Life Lab learning experiences. Identifies four relevant enabling factors with clear explanations and offers a reasonable link between the factors and Life Lab experiences, though not always deeply developed. Demonstrates sound understanding of empathy development, with minor gaps in detail or clarity. Identifies three to four enabling factors, though one may be weakly justified or not fully aligned with the Life Lab context and explanations are adequate but somewhat general, lacking deeper insight. Provides limited or surface-level references to the Life Lab. Identifies two or three enabling factors, with explanations that are unclear, incomplete, or mostly descriptive. Connections to the Life Lab are minimal or absent. Provides one or no valid enabling factors and explanations are largely incorrect, irrelevant, or missing. No evidence of understanding the Life Lab context or empathy development.
3. Explain FOUR reinforcing factors that may help caregivers maintain empathy during the Life Lab experience and recommend post activities for these factors (8 marks). Presents four highly relevant and well-defined reinforcing factors and provides thorough, insightful explanations that clearly show how each factor affects empathy. Demonstrates a strong and explicit connection to Life Lab learning experiences. Identifies four relevant reinforcing factors with clear explanations and offers a reasonable link between the factors and Life Lab experiences, though not always deeply developed. Demonstrates sound understanding of empathy development, with minor gaps in detail or clarity. Identifies three to four reinforcing factors, though one may be weakly justified or not fully aligned with the Life Lab context and explanations are adequate but somewhat general, lacking deeper insight. Provides limited or surface-level references to the Life Lab. Identifies two or three reinforcing factors, with explanations that are unclear, incomplete, or mostly descriptive. Connections to the Life Lab are minimal or absent. Provides one or no valid reinforcing factors and explanations are largely incorrect, irrelevant, or missing. No evidence of understanding the Life Lab context or empathy development.
4. Apply SIX Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) to improve empathy among Caregivers and explain how each BCTs can be applied to caregiver training within the Life Lab (18 marks). Identifies six highly relevant BCTs with clear, accurate and detailed explanations. Provides strong, context-specific applications to Life Lab demonstrating deep understanding. Identifies six relevant BCTs with clear but slightly less detailed explanations. Applications to Life Lab are appropriate, though not consistently in-depth. Identifies five to six BCTs, but explanations are basic, uneven, or partially correct. Life Lab applications lack depth and detail. Identifies three to four BCTs with unclear or incomplete explanations. Applications to Life Lab are minimal, vague, or not well linked to empa