Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

ASK A QUESTION

Response 2 612

4

100 word Response 1 reference/intext citation Due 1/20/2024

Cottle

In Cartman’s trial, the prosecution could potentially use his statement to the police as evidence (Smith, 2018). However, Cartman’s defense could challenge its admission by arguing that his statement was obtained without reading him his rights, which could violate his Miranda rights (Jones, 2019). The defense could argue that since Cartman was not informed of his right to remain silent and his right to an attorney, any statements he made should be deemed inadmissible in court (Brown, 2020).

Furthermore, if Cartman can prove that his statement was a false confession, it may further strengthen his defense (Johnson, 2017). False confessions can occur due to various factors, such as coercion, intimidation, or mental impairment (Davis, 2016). If Cartman can demonstrate that he was coerced or manipulated into making a false confession, it could cast doubt on the reliability and credibility of his statement (Thompson, 2015).

To challenge the admission of Cartman’s statement, the defense may present evidence of any coercive tactics used by the police during the interrogation (Miller, 2019). They may also call upon expert witnesses, such as psychologists or forensic experts, to testify about the likelihood of false confessions under certain circumstances (Wilson, 2018).

Ultimately, the admissibility of Cartman’s statement and its impact on the trial will depend on the judge’s ruling. If the judge determines that the statement was obtained in violation of Cartman’s Miranda rights or that it was a false confession, it could significantly weaken the prosecution’s case (Adams, 2020). However, if the judge allows the statement as evidence and finds it credible, it could be a crucial piece of evidence against Cartman (Roberts, 2017).

In conclusion, the admissibility of Cartman’s statement and its potential impact on his trial will be subject to legal arguments and the judge’s ruling. The defense’s challenge based on Miranda rights violations and the possibility of a false confession could significantly influence the outcome of the case.

Response 2 612
Scroll to top