Assignment 2: Case Study

Using Data to Build a Stronger Workforce

Due: Monday, 9:00 am (eastern), Week 6  (Weight: 25%)

 Overview

C-Suite leaders rely on data to drive decisions. However, many HR professionals come from “non-quant” backgrounds that leave them feeling less than confident when it comes to understanding the numbers and using data to evaluate and communicate critical HR initiatives. Like it or not, having a seat at the table requires that you can speak with data.   

The good news is that you do not need to be a financial or data-analytics expert. You do, however, need to be able to ask the right questions when the numbers are put in front of you and you need to be able to identify the trends and patterns to successfully manage talent. If you cannot do this, there is a strong possibility you will not be a part of “real” business conversations.

This assignment presents you with an opportunity to explore how data can be used to make more effective talent-management decisions. By developing these skills, you will be better equipped to challenge assumptions and to create effective hiring and compensation models. Since we can never have complete data, our decision-making process must acknowledge what we know and what we don’t know. Even with incomplete data, however, our actions must be reasonable, given the time frame and resources we have. Additionally, any actions we recommend must include a clear understanding of how success will be measured, so as to indicate the anticipated return on investment (ROI).

 

 

Instructions

 

For this assignment, you will write a paper based on the case study, Agoda: People Analytics and Business Culture. In your paper, you will analyze the data and provide a recommendation for action. Your paper must address the following topics: the challenges and opportunity; the data that is known and unknown; the culture of the organization; and how data can be leveraged to support a plan of action.

 

Use the outline below to organize your paper: 

 

1.      Executive Summary 

 

An executive summary is a brief synopsis of a paper or report. It is a helpful tool that allows readers to get a snapshot of what will be discussed in the paper. Your Executive Summary should not include detailed information, but simply present an overview of your position.  

 

2.      Data and Culture

a.      What are the data collection/analysis tools being considered in the case?  

i.       How might they improve the way talent is managed?

ii.      What drawbacks or dangers are presented?

b.      How might the need for transparency and actionable data create a negative environment? What are some unintended consequences the data might lead to? Think in particular about the need for privacy.

 

3.      Data Analysis

a.      What does the data in Exhibit 2 tell us? Which team has the highest correlation between performance and compensation? Explain.

b.      What does the data in Exhibit 3 tell us about where we may want to focus our personnel development efforts? Explain. 

c.      What other insights could be helpful to Agoda that are not addressed in the case?

i.       What data would you need to identify these insights?

ii.      How could this data be collected in an accurate and cost-effective way?

 

4.      Recommendation

a.       What are Allen’s key issues going forward?

i.       What role does Agoda’s culture play in each of these issues?

ii.      What previous findings or experiences related to these issues are conveyed in the case?

b.       What advice would you offer him?

c.        How will the success of the recommendations be assessed? Be specific about:

i.       What cost assumptions need to be included? 

ii.      How should ROI be measured?

d.       Summarize the main steps of your action plan to support your recommendation to Allen. 

 Formatting Requirements

•        Uses a double-spaced, professional font (Times New Roman or Arial), 10-12 font size, with oneinch margins on all sides 

•        Includes a Cover Page with the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, course title, and date 

•        Headings are used to identify main topics and subtopics    

•        The assignment is written in a formal manner, with correct spelling and grammar

•        References are included and provide appropriate information that enables the reader to locate the original source  

•        Citations and references must follow the formatting instructions found in the JWMI Writing Standards Guide 

 

 

Rubric: Assignment 2

Criteria	Honors	High Pass	Pass	Low Pass	Unsatisfactory
1. Executive Summary   Weight: 10%	Met HP criteria plus displayed an engaging style that hooks the reader.	Executive summary provided excellent synopsis of the paper.	Executive summary provided basic synopsis of the paper.	Executive summary covered main points, but was disorganized or overly detailed.	Executive summary was missing or offtopic.
2. Data and Culture   Weight:15%	Met HP criteria plus added significant relevant insight from outside sources.	Response provided complete and well-reasoned treatment of both questions using data from the case.	Provided basic response to both questions, but lacked sufficient exploration of key themes.	Response adequately addressed only one of the two main questions.	Response was missing, inaccurate or offtopic.
3. Data Analysis   Weight: 40%	Met HP criteria plus added significant relevant insight from outside sources.	Submitted a complete and well-reasoned treatment of three questions using data from the case.	Submitted a complete and accurate response for two questions, but lacked sufficient exploration of main themes.	Submitted a complete and accurate response for one of the questions.	Did not submit an adequate response for any of the data analysis questions.
4. Make a Sound Recommendati on   Weight: 20%	Recommendation demonstrated exceptional insight and included detailed calculations of ROI considerations and action plan.	Recommendation was wellreasoned and grounded in data and included accurate detail on ROI or action steps.	Recommendation was wellreasoned and grounded in data, but lacked sufficient detail on ROI or action steps.	Recommendation was basic and lacked sufficient detail on ROI and action steps.	Recommendation was missing or did not connect to data, and the objectives of stakeholders.
5. Organization and Writing Conventions   Weight: 15%	Met all HP criteria plus demonstrated a particularly engaging style and structure that elevates the paper to an exemplary level.	Paper was errorfree, wellorganized and easy to follow.	Paper contained minor grammatical errors or only minor organizational shortcomings.	Paper displayed minor grammatical errors, logic and flow were good, but basic.	Paper displayed significant grammatical errors; logic and flow were inconsistent and difficult to follow.