7052CRB Leading and Creating Organisational Health and Wellbeing CWK Assignment Brief

7052CRB Assignment Task

This is an individual assignment based on a critical analysis of a real organisational issue. To complete this assignment, you must choose one of the case studies below from the choice provided on AULA and complete all 3 tasks:

1. Southeastern Railway
2. Rampton Hospital
3. Coventry Cathedral

IMPORTANT: If you use a different case study to the ones provided you will fail and receive a 0% grade.
The assignment consists of a 3,500 words equivalent portfolio of three tasks, task 1 and task 2 are based on the content of your case study. In order to complete this assignment, you must:

• Write a critical report meeting the needs of Task 1,
• Create an information leaflet (1500 words) A4 size, meeting needs of task 2, and
• Write a critical personal and professional development account identified in Task

3. (based on you)

Upon completion of all tasks, submit tasks 1, task 2 , task 3 with reference list under each task as one Word document via submission link on Aula.

Your 3,500-word (+/- 10%) equivalent submission will be assessed on the following areas:

	Maximum marks available in %
1. Write a report critically evaluating the organisation’s approach to leadership, diversity, health and wellbeing.	45
2. Create an information leaflet justifying recommendations.	45
3. A critical personal and professional account	10
Total	100

Assignment structure

The assignment is divided into three tasks.

Task 1 – Report (1500 words) – Total marks 45% (including content, layout and references).

Assessment Marking Criteria

Write a report which critically evaluates the case study’s current approach to:

1. leadership,
2. diversity,
3. organisational health and wellbeing.

We expect that the Task 1 report which consists of 1,500 words will be structured as follows:

1. Cover sheet and contents page. (Not included in word count).
2. A brief introduction to the case study organisation (100 words), based on the interview.
3. Leadership (600 words): A critical analysis of the company’s approach to leadership and leadership styles as evidenced in the case study interview. Remember to include definitions, citations and relevant theory and/or models.
4. Health and wellbeing (400 words): A critical analysis of the company’s current approach to health and wellbeing. Remember to include definitions, citations and relevant theory and/or model/best practice.
5. Diversity (400 words): An analysis of the company’s current approach to diversity. Remember to include definitions, citations and relevant theory and/or model/best practice/legislation.
6. The last page is References in APA 7 format– Remember to cite throughout your work.

References are not included in the word count.

It is expected that appropriate models, academic sources and good practice theory will be applied and be academically rigorous to support your work. Your work must be based on CMI and Module related materials.

This analysis will inform the recommendations for Task 2.

Task 2 – Recommendations (information leaflet 1500 words) Total marks 45%.

You must include 3 recommendations.

• one for leadership,
• one for diversity and
• one for health and wellbeing

stating what the leaders in the case study must do to build a culture that values health and wellbeing and diversity. Make sure they are linked to the company’s approaches to leadership, diversity, health and wellbeing, including the changes required and the benefits to the organisation.

These recommendations are derived from the findings in your task 1 report which relate to the leadership of diversity and organisational wellbeing within the case study organisation.

Consider your audience to be fellow employees and managers within the case study organisation; therefore, your leaflet must be professional in layout.

You must justify each recommendation.

We expect that task 2 includes an A4 size leaflet.

• Your leaflet should be:Clearly and logically presented, (1500 words).
• Present each recommendation in sequence, (500 words each recommendation)
• For each recommendation as a minimum,

1. state why your recommendation is a good idea,
2. explain what is good about it and
3. what limitations it might have,
4. explain how it will work,(Steps to implement it)
5. explain what the benefits of the recommendation will be to the organisation, team and individual employees.

• References to support your academic content in APA 7 format.
  It is expected that where appropriate, relevant CMI and module-related materials, academic sources and good practice theory will be applied and academically rigorous to support your work.

Task 3 – Personal and professional account (500 words – 10% of the marks).

This task must be about you and not the case study.

Using the CMI Code of Conduct and Practice, www.managers.org.uk/code write a critical personal and professional account, answering the following question:

Which 2 leadership skills and 2 leadership behaviours do you need to develop in order to effectively manage and develop a culture of health and wellbeing in your current or future career?

We expect this account to cover:

1. Identify 2 leadership skills you want to develop for your current or future career.
2. Identify 2 leadership behaviours you want to develop for your current or future career.
3. Use the CMI code of conduct to match your chosen skills and behaviours.
4. Include a critical account of how and why you have identified these skills and behaviours and how you have matched them to the key areas on the CMI code of conduct.
5. Ensure your critical account includes how these skills and behaviours will help you as a leader to manage and develop a culture of health and wellbeing.

• References to support your academic content in APA 7 format.

Please note this is not a reflective activity.

Submission Instructions:

Remember

1. This is an individual assignment. You may not work in groups, formally or informally.
2. Your assessment of the organisation’s position and your recommendations MUST be based upon the case study interview you have selected.
3. Some wider research is beneficial, but it must not detract from your prime focus which is the case study interview and CMI and module-related models and content.
4. In your responses, you are allowed to make reasonable research-based assumptions to the case study details provided. However, the case study should not be changed or compromised in any way. If your analysis is not based on the case study interview you will lose significant marks. If you use a different case study to the ones provided you will fail and receive 0% grade
5. You need to apply a selection of the models, tools and methods that have been referred to in the module and discuss their relevance to the situation as you understand it from the case study interview.
6. To get best possible grades, please ensure you use your models and theories which are part of your module materials. See rubric for further guidance.
7. You will lose marks by not applying evidence to those models and theories.
8. You must include appropriately listed and cited references, using APA 7 for each task.
9. A typical APA 7 Aula page reference should include the specific page title, with it’s Aula Page ID number. For example, Case studies in the assignment would be referenced as “Aula 7052CRB. (2025a). Employers videos /case study name. https://coventry.aula.education.” The in text citation would be (Aula 7052CRB, 2025a). Each Aula reference and matching citation has a unique suffix on the date field. See the assignment support material and support sessions for further examples including CMI LeadershipDirect referencing.

Your report must:

1. Include a cover sheet with your ID number (NOT YOUR NAME), your chosen employer case study and your word count.
2. Be typed in Word – DO NOT upload PDF versions of your work.
3. Include page numbers,
4. Be written in Arial font size 12,
5. Be 1.5 spaced,
6. Be submitted on Turnitin (as directed) by the assignment deadline. Submit tasks1, task 2, task 3 and reference list as one word document via submission link. Ensure that you have saved a copy of your submission and save a copy of the Turnitin receipt after you have submitted.
7. The word count is 3,500. There is an allowance of plus or minus 10% of the word count limit, excluding the list of references and the cover sheet.
8. Include the following statement on the cover sheet: The work contained in this document has been submitted by the student in partial fulfilment of the requirement of their course and award and is confirmation that this is their own work.

Please note that cover sheet, contents page, tables/diagrams/charts, appendices and the reference list are not included in the word count. However, do not rely on appendices for information which directly supports your report – appendices are not marked. Do not rely on extensive use of tables to support your report – you are marked on the quality of your analysis, not the quantity of words.

Are You Looking for Answer of 7052CRB Assignment

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Learning Outcomes:

Module Learning Outcomes
LO1:	Critically evaluate ethical and inclusive approaches to leadership, diversity and organisational wellbeing in professional practice
LO2:	Critically reflect on the leadership qualities for effectively managing health and wellbeing in a practice context in relation to professional development.
PSRB Learning Outcomes
PSRB LO1		Understand the principles for leading and developing people
PSRB LO2		Understand leadership and development strategy
PSRB LO3		Understand the impact of managing mental health and wellbeing on organisational performance
PSRB LO4		Know how to develop a culture of mental health and wellbeing

7052CRB Assessment Criteria:

	Marks Below 40%: Poor down to Irrelevant	Marks in the range 40– 49%: Adequate	Marks in the range 50– 59%: Good	Marks in the range 60– 69%: Very Good	Marks 70% and above: Excellent to outstanding
OVERALL (40%)	This work does not meet	An adequate ability to	A commitment to meeting	Evidence of a competent level of work. Task requirements met, but there is the suggestion that some further work could be beneficial. There is clear evidence of a desire to master the tasks defined within the analysis. The focus of the analysis is clearly grounded in the case study interview. The use of CMI and module- related resources is clear.	Articulate and generally persuasive levels of
	the task requirements of the	meet the task	the task requirements set		work. The task requirements are fully met and
	assignment. The work	requirements but perhaps	within the analysis. Task		perhaps exceeded. There is clear evidence of
	demonstrates little or no	only marginally, and	requirements are met,		an ability to master the tasks defined within the
	understanding of the	without confidence. A	but not always		analysis. The focus of the analysis is clearly
	analysis, and little insight	great deal of further work	confidently. The work		grounded in the case study interview. The use
	into the content of the	is required, and some	may display some		of CMI and module- related resources is fully
	module or task. At lower	aspects of the analysis	misunderstandings and		evidenced.
	grades, the analysis is not	appear to be	flaws in the thought
	grounded in the case study	misunderstood.	process. The analysis is
	interview. CMI and module	The analysis is partially	partially grounded in the
	related resources are not	grounded in the case	case study interview. The
	evident.	study interview. The use	use of CMI and module-
		of CMI and module-	related resources is
		related resources are	limited but still evident.